by Don Clasen
Jan. 26, 2016
Everyone in the production and marketing of 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi from Paramount on down swears this isn’t “a political movie.” “The politics got in the way of this great human story,” director Michael Bay told Bill O’Reilly.[1] Yet politics is exactly what the Republicans have made of this incident since the assassination of Ambassador Christopher Stevens on September 11, 2012, 11 years to the day after 9-11.[2] The intent here is to outrage public perception of what happened that day and blame it all on Hillary and/or “liberal incompetence.” Not that Hillary is anything to write home about. But 13 Hours is just the first of many efforts this year designed to once again throw an election their way.
When they first started whining about their blown operation in 2012 even after the election was over, I remember thinking to myself what hutzpah it takes to not just cut your losses, slither off into the night and thank your lucky stars you got away with literal murder as it was. I couldn’t believe they would be so reckless as to not let go of it. They still haven’t because those at the top of the pyramid can never lose. At the very least a Netanyahu would love a Ted Cruz, Paul Ryan or Bloomberg who would hand the car keys right back to him.
Huntin’ For Hillary
We can assume that as a psy-op, any manipulation of public consciousness would have to be done subtly given the partisanship thus far and the explosive nature of the real story. It starts with persuading an action maestro like Bay to helm it. I also keep getting the feeling that Mitchell Zuckoff, the author of the original book was approached by someone to write the story. Any guesses as to who?
13 Hours works hard to get the audience to emotionally identify with our all-American heroes as down-to-earth Joes in a near-impossible situation (no argument there). Their other lives as husbands and fathers missing their families and tortured by their decisions to sign up are repeatedly doted upon with near melodramatic emphasis.
In contrast to these sympathetic portrayals is just about every civilian. “Bob” the CIA station chief is especially cast as an arrogant control freak who disrespects his security men even to the point of insult.[3] One of the most ridiculous lines along the “liberal incompetence” theme has to be when he assures Jack Silva, “There’s no threat here. The best and brightest from the farm, Harvard and Yale graduates have got this.” I couldn’t help but bust out laughing, the red meat was so obvious. Likewise for the American flag floating in the water at the end; the female agent “tracking down yellow cake,” it’s all there. Even the Russians are implicated by a street sale of their missiles, and from a hopped-up black gangbanger brandishing a handgun at that. The civilian interpreter, the fresh-faced staffers who’ve never seen combat, represent enough stereotyping to sink a battleship. It makes it easy for the audience to know who to blame along with the mysterious inaction of people in the background.[4]
“Bob” the CIA station chief
The Not So Good
When Bob later explains that “winning hearts and minds” is the ambassador’s hardcore philosophy I almost bust out laughing again. Why? Because the stunning deceitfulness and hypocrisy of America’s actual policy makes such a claim absurd, except maybe as a ploy to mollify and dupe the public. For the sordid truth is that Benghazi had thus far been the American center for running terrorist proxy groups (including suicide bombers no less) of the disgruntled eastern tribes. “The so-called US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya was in fact a CIA station with more than 50 personnel on hand to maintain liaison with the Al Qaeda death squads deployed by NATO intelligence in 2010 and 2011 for the purpose of overthrowing… Qaddafi.”[5]
“Decapitation” is the charming little “hearts and minds” term Americans prefer for such activities, and at the time the CIA was shifting Gaddafi’s armory and terror squads into Syria so your scarce tax dollars could be spent “decapitating” President Assad too. Again, the movie deliberately spins this reality in opening remarks claiming, “The CIA was attempting to intercept the most lethal weapons before they filtered into the black market.”
Such comedians these guys are. Apparently this “black market” consisted of the staging grounds for the covert invasion of Syria through Turkey. This is why Ambassador Stevens is seen meeting with the Turkish ambassador earlier that day, to work out details of this next phase in the neo-con plan to take out seven of Israel’s “enemies.”[6]
The Butcher of Damascus and his wife Vampira make a surprise visit to a Christmas show rehearsal.
Now The Bad
That’s what our “liberal” administration was doing at the time. What the Republicans were doing was even worse. “Benghazi” was an attempt by Obama’s many enemies to oust him with “an October Surprise come early” as Webster Tarpley put it, to make him look “not in control” and throw the election Romney’s way. Just one of Gordon Duff’s articles at the time—“VT’s 30 Day Old Story Had It Right”[7]—will give you plenty to chew on. In it he details a highly-planned operation including up to 15 specialty teams flown in the week before, mortar assaults pre-sighted days in advance[8] and coordinated with a “cover and deception” global psy-op of a highly-inflammatory Innocence of Muslims trailer involving a former Gladio operative no less, pretending to be a pastor.
Management of the US press, continually dancing from one conspiracy theory to another, is a clear sign that this operation originated in the United States. It was handed off to an intelligence agency tied to the Romney campaign and Netanyahu [Mossad], who turned to friends in the Gulf, as intelligence reports confirmed, to complete the complex and well coordinated military operation on two continents.
Jim Dean confirms that a special UAE commando unit was flown in the day before, trained for two years at $300,000 per year per soldier and equipped with very sophisticated jammers, something “mobs” would never have access to. This explains the confusion in communications Bob and everyone else up the chain were encountering and their caution. These were the professionals behind the locals supposedly inflamed by the trailer, though the movie tries to limit that role to Ansar al Sharia. The “official determination” by the US government does too, apparently a bi-partisan effort to suppress the explosive truth.
And The Ugly
Worse yet, Benghazi itself may have been a cover for a coup d’etat attempt by top Pentagon officers (including General Ham of AfriCom, directly in command), and led by General David Petraeus. Apparently this much larger plan was to assassinate Mitt Romney just days before the 2012 election, blame it on Obama and install Petraeus as the nominee. When Obama learned of this he immediately beefed up security for himself and Romney,[9] later brought down these officers with sex and financial scandals,[10] had Petraeus arrested after a shootout on Dupont Circle, and forced him to resign as CIA Director.[11] If Obama had any hesitation about responding to Libya it could have been over fears of rushing into a trap. He has been reluctant to bring this story out into the open lest it cause a civil war.
Our military is full of apocalyptic madmen now thanks to years of Zionist propaganda and Christian Dominionism as Gordon recently wrote about.[12] After years of a non-stop Mossad-led psy op against Obama so many Pentagon brass fear and loathe him now. They may have driven this coup all on their own but I doubt it. Sensei Netanyahu and other Zionist elites, the masters of divide and conquer, seem all over this huge operation.
Well, which is it?
This is what America does best now apparently—destroy nations, leaving behind failed states while pretending we’ve liberated them. This too is another dirty little secret about US policy—whom we do this for. Even the craven Roman Empire forced enough tribute upon the nations they targeted to pay for the invasion. We do this all gratis for Israel, who is willing to burn down the entire neighborhood if need be so they can remain, not just the last dog on the block but the only dog on the block. From there they can move on to World Domination or so they fantasize. But God and the prophecies foretell a different fate (Isa 28:14-18).
The long-standing plan for Greater Israel
[1] http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/01/20/michael-bay-defends-benghazi-film-13-hours-it-avoids-politics/
[2] Indicating a highly-symbolic Satanic sacrifice and planned well in advanced from high up in the pyramid.
[3] “Bob” has criticized the way he was portrayed in the movie. http://www.usnews.com/news/entertainment/articles/2016-01-16/author-of-benghazi-book-stands-by-pivotal-stand-down-scene
[4] I’m not saying the contractors were lying in their accounts of the story. In a world of endless “cover and deception” I’m just going by what it looks like.
[5] http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/05/16/gop-dredges-up-benghazi-incident-to-impeach-obama/
[6] General Wesley Clark told of his stunned reaction upon finding out about this plan after 9-11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw
[7] http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10/22/vts-30-day-old-story-on-benghazi-had-it-right/
[8] One of the contractor’s in the movie muses on this possibility for a moment.
[9] The Romney Campaign was itself one of the Benghazi plotters and shows you what a deep sea of “big fish eating the little fish” politics can be.
[10] Right-wingers naturally screamed that Obama was purging the military of “patriots.”
[11] “7 Days in May: Obama Versus the Generals: A Failed Coup Attempt,” by S.R. Shearer, Dec. 1, 2012. http://www.antipasministries.com/html/file0000398.htm, a stunning article. Steve Shearer, a former Vietnam intel officer is lately endorsing the idea that Donald Trump is the Antichrist! His website is packed with great info on the American Empire but he’s a big Israel supporter and I obviously don’t endorse his theory about Trump.
[12] http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/01/17/neo-americas-military-they-simply-cant-be-trusted/
